Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Solving PISA Problem Using Indonesian Cultural Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2021.6.1.52-67Keywords:
Mathematical Literacy, PISA Problem, Indonesian Cultural ContextAbstract
This study aims to examine students’ mathematical literacy in solving PISA problems using the Indonesian cultural context. This is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. As the subject of this study are three 9th grade students with high, average, and low mathematical abilities. In collecting the data, the researchers used three instruments, namely, mathematical ability test, mathematical literacy test, and interview guidelines. The results reveal that student with high mathematical ability meets all indicators in the process of formulating, employing, and interpreting. Otherwise, students with average or low mathematical abilities only meet some indicators in the process of mathematical literacy. Therefore, it is suggested for the teacher to provide practice especially for students having average or low mathematical abilities with literacy problems using contexts that exist in students’ life, such as the Indonesian cultural context
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Akyüz, G. (2014). PISA 2003 Sonuçlar?na göre Ö?renci ve S?n?f Özelliklerinin Matematik Okuryazarl???na ve Problem Çözme Becerilerine Etkisi. ?lkö?retim Online, 9(2), 668–678. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.74461.
Anggoro, A. Y., Julie, H., Sanjaya, F., Andy Rudhito, M., & Wiadnyana, D. P. (2019). The mathematics education department students’ ability in mathematical literacy for the change and relationship problems on the PISA adaptation test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012085.
Bartolini, M. G. (2014). Encyclopedia of mathematics education. In Encyclopedia of mathematics education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8.
Charmila, N., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2016). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA menggunakan konteks Jambi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 198–207.
Gustiningsi, T. (2015). Pengembangan soal pengayaan model PISA level 4 kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika JPM RAFA, 2(2), 198–213. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/jpmrafa/article/view/1248.
Jalil, A. 2018. Matematika dalam perspektif sosial budaya. Prosiding SNMPMAT. Vol 1.
Janah, S. R., Suyitno, H., & Rosyida, I. (2019). Pentingnya literasi matematika dan berpikir kritis matematis dalam menghadapi abad ke-21. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 905–910. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/download/29305/12924.
Kafifah, A., Sugiarti, T., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2018). Pelevelan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa berdasarkan kemampuan matematika dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA konten change and relationship. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3). http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/kadikma/article/view/10918.
Karmila. (2018). Deskripsi kemampuan literasi matematis siswa ditinjau dari gender. Pedagogy, 3(1), 126–137.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Literasi adalah kompetensi abad 21. http://pgdikdas.kemdikbud.go.id /literasi-adalah-kompetensi-abad-xxi.
Khoirudin, A., Setyawati, R. D., & Nursyahida, F. (2017). Profil kemampuan literasi matematika siswa berkemampuan matematis rendah dalam menyelesaikan soal berbentuk PISA. AKSIOMA, 8(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v8i2.1839.
Koshy, V., Ernest, P., & Casey, R. (2009). Mathematically gifted and talented learners: Theory and practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802566907.
Lailiyah, S. (2017). Mathematical literacy skills of students' in term of gender differences, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 050019-1-12, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995146.
Mahdiansyah, & Rahmawati. (2014). Literasi matematika siswa pendidikan menengah?: Analisis menggunakan desain tes internasional dengan konteks Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 452–469.
Meiliyah, A dan Setianingsih, R. 2019. Profil Komunikasi Matematis Tulis Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Kemampuan Matematika. Jurnal UNESA. 21, 318–327.
Mena, A. B., Lukito, A., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2016). Literasi matematis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontekstual ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 187-198.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A. methods sourcebook and the coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE, 381.
OECD. (2017). “PISA 2015 assesment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving, revised edition. PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en.
OECD. (2018). What 15-year-old students in Indonesia know and can do. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018, 1–10. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/ Data
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
Permendikbud. (2014). Permendikbud nomor 104 tahun 2014 tentang penilaian hasil belajar oleh pendidik pada pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI, 1–8. https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/bsnp/Permendikbud104-2014PenilaianHasilBelajar.pdf.
Permendikbud No. 64. (2013). Permendikbud-Nomor-64-tahun-2013-ttg-SI. 2011.
Putra, Y.Y & Vebrian, R. (2019). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA konteks kain cual Bangka Belitung. Jurnal Cendekia, 3(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i1.2230.
Santoso, R. M., & Setyaningsih, N. (2020). Literasi matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS bentuk aljabar berdasarkan kemampuan matematika. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya (KNPMP) V, 62–71.
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126.
Ulfa, M., Lubab, A., & Arrifadah, Y. (2017). Melatih Literasi Matematis Siswa dengan Metode Naive Geometry. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 2(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2017.2.1.81-92.
Wahyuni, A., & Pertiwi, S. (2017). Etnomatematika dalam ragam hias melayu. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v3i2.61.
Wulandari, E., & Azka, R. (2018). Menyambut PISA 2018?: Pengembangan literasi matematika untuk mendukung kecakapan abad 21. de-Fermat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 31–38.
Anggoro, A. Y., Julie, H., Sanjaya, F., Andy Rudhito, M., & Wiadnyana, D. P. (2019). The mathematics education department students’ ability in mathematical literacy for the change and relationship problems on the PISA adaptation test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012085.
Bartolini, M. G. (2014). Encyclopedia of mathematics education. In Encyclopedia of mathematics education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8.
Charmila, N., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2016). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA menggunakan konteks Jambi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 198–207.
Gustiningsi, T. (2015). Pengembangan soal pengayaan model PISA level 4 kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika JPM RAFA, 2(2), 198–213. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/jpmrafa/article/view/1248.
Jalil, A. 2018. Matematika dalam perspektif sosial budaya. Prosiding SNMPMAT. Vol 1.
Janah, S. R., Suyitno, H., & Rosyida, I. (2019). Pentingnya literasi matematika dan berpikir kritis matematis dalam menghadapi abad ke-21. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 905–910. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/download/29305/12924.
Kafifah, A., Sugiarti, T., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2018). Pelevelan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa berdasarkan kemampuan matematika dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA konten change and relationship. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3). http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/kadikma/article/view/10918.
Karmila. (2018). Deskripsi kemampuan literasi matematis siswa ditinjau dari gender. Pedagogy, 3(1), 126–137.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Literasi adalah kompetensi abad 21. http://pgdikdas.kemdikbud.go.id /literasi-adalah-kompetensi-abad-xxi.
Khoirudin, A., Setyawati, R. D., & Nursyahida, F. (2017). Profil kemampuan literasi matematika siswa berkemampuan matematis rendah dalam menyelesaikan soal berbentuk PISA. AKSIOMA, 8(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v8i2.1839.
Koshy, V., Ernest, P., & Casey, R. (2009). Mathematically gifted and talented learners: Theory and practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802566907.
Lailiyah, S. (2017). Mathematical literacy skills of students' in term of gender differences, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 050019-1-12, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995146.
Mahdiansyah, & Rahmawati. (2014). Literasi matematika siswa pendidikan menengah?: Analisis menggunakan desain tes internasional dengan konteks Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 452–469.
Meiliyah, A dan Setianingsih, R. 2019. Profil Komunikasi Matematis Tulis Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Kemampuan Matematika. Jurnal UNESA. 21, 318–327.
Mena, A. B., Lukito, A., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2016). Literasi matematis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontekstual ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 187-198.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A. methods sourcebook and the coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE, 381.
OECD. (2017). “PISA 2015 assesment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving, revised edition. PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en.
OECD. (2018). What 15-year-old students in Indonesia know and can do. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018, 1–10. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/ Data
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
Permendikbud. (2014). Permendikbud nomor 104 tahun 2014 tentang penilaian hasil belajar oleh pendidik pada pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI, 1–8. https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/bsnp/Permendikbud104-2014PenilaianHasilBelajar.pdf.
Permendikbud No. 64. (2013). Permendikbud-Nomor-64-tahun-2013-ttg-SI. 2011.
Putra, Y.Y & Vebrian, R. (2019). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA konteks kain cual Bangka Belitung. Jurnal Cendekia, 3(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i1.2230.
Santoso, R. M., & Setyaningsih, N. (2020). Literasi matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS bentuk aljabar berdasarkan kemampuan matematika. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya (KNPMP) V, 62–71.
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126.
Ulfa, M., Lubab, A., & Arrifadah, Y. (2017). Melatih Literasi Matematis Siswa dengan Metode Naive Geometry. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 2(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2017.2.1.81-92.
Wahyuni, A., & Pertiwi, S. (2017). Etnomatematika dalam ragam hias melayu. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v3i2.61.
Wulandari, E., & Azka, R. (2018). Menyambut PISA 2018?: Pengembangan literasi matematika untuk mendukung kecakapan abad 21. de-Fermat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 31–38.
Downloads
Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
Andari, R. M., & Setianingsih, R. (2021). Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Solving PISA Problem Using Indonesian Cultural Context. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 6(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2021.6.1.52-67
Issue
Section
Articles
