Editorial Policies

Table of Contents

FOCUS AND SCOPE:

JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) contains the articles results of research associated with the review of mathematics which include: a review of the math curriculum, strategy/method/approach to learning mathematics, software development of mathematics learning, evaluation/assessment of learning mathematics, psychology of learning mathematics, students thinking process to learning math, math learning dynamic development, and review trends journal articles in the field of mathematics education. 

SECTION POLICIES:
ARTICLES

  Open Submissions  Indexed  Peer Reviewed

PEER REVIEW PROCESS:

The submitted manuscript will be sent to two anonymous referees for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation (double-blind review). The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible.
The editor evaluates the recommendation and notifies the author of the manuscript status. The manuscript may be:
1. Accepted for publication as is
2. Accepted for publication with minor changes, with no re-review necessary
3. Accepted for publication after substantial revision and additional review
4. Rejected

OPEN ACCESS POLICY:

This journal provides open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to a full-text paper, or use them for other legitimate purposes without asking permission from the publisher or the author.

PUBLICATION ETHICS:

JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) is a peer-reviewed journal online and published bi-annually on June and December by Program Studies of Mathematics Education, State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel, Surabaya. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

Program Studies of Mathematics Education, State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel - Surabaya as the publisher of Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editorial board must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from passing off another’s paper as the author’s own paper to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING

JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) has been Indexed by 

LICENSING AND ARCHIVING

This journal allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC BY-SA. This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, and license derivative works under similar terms. Furthermore, JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) is archived in Indonesia One Search.

PUBLICATION FREQUENCY

The journal published biannually e.i, in Juni and December
JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) published via journal website (http://jurnalftk.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/jrpm)
JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) published by Program Studies of Mathematics Education, Department of Mathematics and Sciences Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

PUBLICATION CHARGES

The author is not charged for submitting, processing, and publishing their articles. Readers can read and download any full-text articles for free of charge. 

PLAGIARISM CHECKER

We accept all terms and conditions of COPE about plagiarism and in case, any attempt of plagiarism is brought to our attention accompanied by convincing evidence, we act based on flowcharts and workflows determined in COPE. All submissions will be checked with TURNITIN: new submission and after acceptance from the editorial boards. We do not process any plagiarised contents. If an article has over 20% of plagiarism based on the result of the check, we will send back the article to the author to be revised for the plagiarised contents.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.