Pengembangan Soal Numerasi Berbasis Konteks Nilai Budaya Primbon Jawa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2022.7.1.20-34Keywords:
Numeracy, Context, Javanese culture, DevelopmentAbstract
This study describes developing numeration questions based on the context of Javanese primbon cultural values are valid. The questions are developed using the first three of the ADDIE method, analysis, design, and development. The validity is focused on four aspects, instruction, contents, construct, and language. The validating questions are three items of numeration questions in the form of complex multiple-choice questions. The validators in this research are four experts from Mathematics Education and Test/Evaluation Development. Results of the study show that the numeracy questions based on the context of Javanese primbon cultural values are valid with a score of 0.82. The final product is the prototype II is built upon the expert notion.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, AS. (2017). Ethnomathematics in perspective of Sundanese culture. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1-16.
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142.
Aini, IN, Zulkardi, Putri, RII, & Yaniawati, P. (2019). PISA-LIKE mathematics problem using rice fields context in Karawang. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012073.
Dasaprawira, MN, Zulkardi, & Susanti, E. (2019). Developing mathematics questions of PISA type using Bangka context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10 (2), pp 303-314.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers
Irawan, A, Lestari, M. Rahayu, W. & Wulan R. (2019). Ethnomathematics batik design for the island of Bali. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1338(1), 012045.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, (2020). Desain Pengembangan Soal AKM. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan.
Lestari, M, Irawan, A, Rahayu, W, & Parwati, NW. (2018). Elements of ethnomathematics in Balinese batik using the backpropagation method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022 (1), 012012.
Moeis, Syarif. (2006). Pengaruh bentuk tes objektif terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pendidikan sejarah ditinjau dari sikap siswa. Percikan Iman,70, pp. 31-38.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Nizar, H., Putri, RII, & Zulkardi. (2018). Developing PISA-LIKE mathematics problem using the 2018 Asian Games football and table tennis context. Journal of Mathematics Education, 9 (2), 183-194.
Nur, AS., Kartono, K., Zaenuri, Z., Waluya, SB., & Rochmad, R. (2020). Ethnomathematics thought and its influence in mathematical learning. MaPan, 8(2), 205-223.
Nur, AS., Waluya, SB., Rochmad, R., Wardono, W. (2020). Contextual learning with ethnomathematics in enhancing the problem-solving based on thinking levels. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(3), 331–344.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (Draft). New York: Columbia University.
Oktiningrum, W., Zulkardi, dan Hartono, Y. (2016). Developing a PISA-LIKE math assignment with Indonesian natural and cultural heritage as a context for assessing students' mathematical literacy. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7 (1), 1-8.
Permatasari, R, Putri, RII., Zulkardi. (2018). PISA-Like: The context of football in the Asian Games. Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 271-280.
Prahmana, RCI, Yunianto, W., Rosa, M., & Orey, DC (2021). Ethnomathematics: pranatamangsa system and the birth-death ceremonial in Yogyakarta. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), pp. 93-112.
Putra, Y. Y dan Vebrian, R. (2019). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA konteks kain cual Bangka Belitung. Journal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), pp. 333-340.
Risdiyanti, I., Prahmana, R. C.I., & Shahrill, M. (2019). Social arithmetic learning trajectory using traditional Indonesian games. Online Basic Education, 18 (4), 2094-2108.
Robiyanto, & Puryandani, Siti. (2015). The javanese lunar calendar’s effect on Indonesian stock return. Gajahmada International Journal of Business, 17(2), 125-137.
Rosa, M., & Orey, DC (2016). Ethnomodelling as a theoretical framework for research on ethnomathematics and mathematical modelling. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education. 6(2), 62-80.
Roth, W. M. (1996). Where is context in contextual word problems? Mathematical practices and products in grade 8 students’ answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 487-527.
Steen, Lynn Arthur. (2001). Mathematics and numeracy: Two literacies, one language. The Journal of The Singapore Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
Tim GLN Kemdikbud. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Numerasi Gerakan Literasi Nasional.
Tout, Dave & Gal, Iddo. (2015). Perspectives on numeracy: Reflections from international assessments. ZDM Mathematics Education.
Tutak, FA, Bondy, E., & Adams, TL (2011). Critical pedagogy for critical mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(1), 65–74.
Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Changing context in tertiary mathematics implications for diversity and equity. The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. pp 13-26.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Agus Prasetyo Kurniawan, Mega Teguh Budiarto, Rooselyna Ekawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
