Development of Authentic Assessment in Geometry Learning


  • Abd Kadir Jaelani Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Hasbi Institut Agama Islam As'adiyah Sengkang, Indonesia



Teaching geometry, Authentic assessment, 4-D model


This study aims to describe the process and results of the development of authentic assessment in teaching geometry which refers to the 4-D model. Geometry authentic assessment in this study includes learning achievement tests, self-assessment, portfolio assessment, performance assessment guidelines, self-assessment guidelines, portfolio assessment guidelines, feasibility test instruments, teacher response questionnaires, student response questionnaires, and validation sheets. The research subjects are 8th-grade students of SMPN 2 Barombong, Gowa Regency. The validity test analysis is rationally obtained through two the results of the validation of experts, test reliability both rationally and empirically, and objectivity using the product-moment formula. The results showed that the authentic assessment met the criteria of being valid, practical, and effective. As a consequence, it is suggested that the development of authentic assessment tools for geometry learning be expanded to other resources to make teacher evaluation easier. Furthermore, the study's implications provide teachers with information for conducting authentic assessment formulation in the implementation of learning, especially for students.


Download data is not yet available.


Altıparmak, K., & Gürcan, G. (2021). Examination of 4th Grade Students’ Definitions for Square, Rectangle and Triangle Geometric Shapes. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3).

Anisa, T. W. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Vektor untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 102–113.

Arifin, Z. (2018). Development of authentic assessment instrument for performance in learning mathematics in linear program. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2), 154–162.

Azizah, I. N., Amri, M. K., Ikashaum, F., & Mispani, M. (2021). Pengembangan Modul Kalkulus dengan Pemanfaatan Software Geogebra. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 6(1), 13–23.

Björklund, C., Marton, F., & Kullberg, A. (2021). What is to be learnt? Critical aspects of elementary arithmetic skills. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 261–284.

Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Rethinking Education in the New Normal Post-COVID-19 Era: A Curriculum Studies Perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20018.

Caniglia, G., John, B., Bellina, L., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Cohmer, S., & Laubichler, M. D. (2018). The glocal curriculum: A model for transnational collaboration in higher education for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 368–376.

Chaudhary, A., & Batra, L. (2021). Defining the Undefined: Axiomathes, August.

da Silva, P. V, & Santos, L. (2019). Construction of triangles : some misconceptions and difficulties HAL Id : hal-02402268. In Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (Issue 20, p. 02402268). Freudenthal Group; Freudenthal Institute; ERME.

Darma, I. K., Karma, I. G. M., & Santian, I. M. A. (2020). Need Analysis for Developing Applied Mathematics Textbooks Based on Blended Learning to Improve Problem Solving Abilities at the Students of Polytechnic State of Bali. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2268.

Fauziah, D., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2018). Mathematics authentic assessment on statistics learning: The case for student mini projects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 012123.

Ferita, R. A. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat penilaian autentik untuk pembelajaran matematika di kelas VIII semester 1. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 1–9.

Fitriani, S., & Yarmayani, A. (2018). Pengembangan rubrik berpikir kreatif siswa menengah atas dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Mushorafa, 7(1), 33–38.

Fu, Y., Liu, Q., & Li, Y. (2021). New Geometric Constants in Banach Spaces Related to the Inscribed Equilateral Triangles of Unit Balls. Symmetry, 13(6), 951.

Garnica, A. V. M, & Vianna, C. R. (2019). Oral History and Mathematics Education (Antonio Vicente Marafioti Garnica (ed.); Issue September 2019). Springer International Publishing.

Ghani, I. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Yahaya, N. A., & Surif, J. (2017). Enhancing students’ HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 849–874.

Hasbi, M., Lukito, A., Sulaiman, R., & Muzaini, M. (2019). Improving the Mathematical Connection Ability of Middle-School Students through Realistic Mathematics Approach. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy, 1(1), 37–46.

Hassan, M. N., Abdullah, A. H., Ismail, N., Suhud, S. N. A., & Hamzah, M. H. (2018). Mathematics Curriculum Framework for Early Childhood Education Based on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 15–31.

Horvath, I. (2016). Disruptive technologies in higher education. 2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), CogInfoCom, 000347–000352.

Ilany, B.-S., & Shmueli, N. (2021). “Three-Stage” Alternative Assessment. Creative Education, 12(07), 1702–1725.

Ilmiwan, B., Festiyed, & Usmeldi. (2019). Development of authentic assessment that based on scientific approach to improve students’ skills of science process in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 012033.

Kallia, M., van Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2021). Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: a literature-informed Delphi study. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 159–187.

Kingston, N., & Broaddus, A. (2017). The Use of Learning Map Systems to Support the Formative Assessment in Mathematics. Education Sciences, 7(1), 41.

Li, N., Huijser, H., Xi, Y., Limniou, M., Zhang, X., & Kek, M. Y. C. A. (2022). Disrupting the Disruption: A Digital Learning HeXie Ecology Model. Education Sciences, 12(2), 63.

Lupyan, G. (2017). The Paradox of the Universal Triangle: Concepts, Language, and Prototypes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 389–412.

Markovits, Z., & Patkin, D. (2020). Preschool In-service Teachers and Geometry: Attitudes, Beliefs and Knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), em0619.

Morino, L. (2021). Basic Euclidean Geometry. In Mathematics and Mechanics - The Interplay: Vol. III (pp. 175–202). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Novita, R., Putra, M., Rosayanti, E., & Fitriati, F. (2018). Design learning in mathematics education: Engaging early childhood students in geometrical activities to enhance geometry and spatial reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088, 012016.

Pereira, J., Wijaya, T. T., Zhou, Y., & Purnama, A. (2021). Learning points, lines, and plane geometry with Hawgent dynamic mathematics software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012057.

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis. (2018). Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning: Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Pre-service Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 012013.

Putri, R. O. E., & Feriyanto, F. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar geometri berbasis science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) untuk mendukung kemampuan spasial. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 1205.

Sabri, M., Retnawati, H., & Fitriatunisyah. (2019). The implementation of authentic assessment in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1200(1), 012006.

Schoevers, E. M., Leseman, P. P. M., Slot, E. M., Bakker, A., Keijzer, R., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2019). Promoting pupils’ creative thinking in primary school mathematics: A case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31(October 2018), 323–334.

Shahbari, J. A., & Abu-Alhija, F. N. (2018). Does Training in Alternative Assessment Matter? The Case of Prospective and Practicing Mathematics Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Alternative Assessment and Their Beliefs About the Nature of Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(7), 1315–1335.

Stewart, Ian (2017). Why Do All Triangles Form a Triangle? The American Mathematical Monthly, 124(1), 70.

Suskie, L. (2018). What is Good Assessment? In Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Syaifuddin, M. (2020). Implementation of authentic assessment on mathematics teaching: Study on junior high school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1491–1502.

Taruh, E., & Mursalin. (2018). Development of Authentic Assesment Tools in Physics Science Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 012200.

Ulusoy, F. (2021). Prospective Early Childhood and Elementary School Mathematics Teachers’ Concept Images and Concept Definitions of Triangles. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 1057–1078.

Vidergor, H. E. (2018). Effectiveness of the multidimensional curriculum model in developing higher‐order thinking skills in elementary and secondary students. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 95–115.

Waller, P. P, & Flood, C. T. (2016). Mathematics as a universal language: transcending cultural lines. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(3), 294–306.

Wang, X., Chen, Y., & Zhu, W. (2021). A Survey on Curriculum Learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1, 1–1.

Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in science education curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 012044.

Widyastuti, S. R., Tola, B., & Tjalla, A. (2021). Modeling authentic assessment : Using analysis based on the Structural Equation Model ( SEM ) Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education Research Article. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6), 5058–5074.

Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., & Suan, L. (2020). Using Geogebra in Teaching Plane Vector. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 15–23.

Yazidah, N. I. (2017). Analisis kesalahan menyelesaikan soal pembuktian geometri Euclid ditinjau dari gender pada mahasiswa IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 71.

Zeggelaar, A., Vermeulen, M., & Jochems, W. (2020). Evaluating effective professional development. Professional Development in Education, 00(00), 1–21.




How to Cite

Jaelani, A. K., & Hasbi, M. (2022). Development of Authentic Assessment in Geometry Learning. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 7(1), 1–19.