Development of Authentic Assessment in Geometry Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2022.7.1.1-19Keywords:
Teaching geometry, Authentic assessment, 4-D modelAbstract
This study aims to describe the process and results of the development of authentic assessment in teaching geometry which refers to the 4-D model. Geometry authentic assessment in this study includes learning achievement tests, self-assessment, portfolio assessment, performance assessment guidelines, self-assessment guidelines, portfolio assessment guidelines, feasibility test instruments, teacher response questionnaires, student response questionnaires, and validation sheets. The research subjects are 8th-grade students of SMPN 2 Barombong, Gowa Regency. The validity test analysis is rationally obtained through two the results of the validation of experts, test reliability both rationally and empirically, and objectivity using the product-moment formula. The results showed that the authentic assessment met the criteria of being valid, practical, and effective. As a consequence, it is suggested that the development of authentic assessment tools for geometry learning be expanded to other resources to make teacher evaluation easier. Furthermore, the study's implications provide teachers with information for conducting authentic assessment formulation in the implementation of learning, especially for students.
Downloads
References
Altıparmak, K., & Gürcan, G. (2021). Examination of 4th Grade Students’ Definitions for Square, Rectangle and Triangle Geometric Shapes. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.340
Anisa, T. W. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Vektor untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2018.3.2.102-113
Arifin, Z. (2018). Development of authentic assessment instrument for performance in learning mathematics in linear program. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v7i2.24884
Azizah, I. N., Amri, M. K., Ikashaum, F., & Mispani, M. (2021). Pengembangan Modul Kalkulus dengan Pemanfaatan Software Geogebra. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 6(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2021.6.1.13-23
Björklund, C., Marton, F., & Kullberg, A. (2021). What is to be learnt? Critical aspects of elementary arithmetic skills. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10045-0
Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Rethinking Education in the New Normal Post-COVID-19 Era: A Curriculum Studies Perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20018. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8315
Caniglia, G., John, B., Bellina, L., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Cohmer, S., & Laubichler, M. D. (2018). The glocal curriculum: A model for transnational collaboration in higher education for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.207
Chaudhary, A., & Batra, L. (2021). Defining the Undefined: Axiomathes, August. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09585-0
da Silva, P. V, & Santos, L. (2019). Construction of triangles : some misconceptions and difficulties HAL Id : hal-02402268. In Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (Issue 20, p. 02402268). Freudenthal Group; Freudenthal Institute; ERME.
Darma, I. K., Karma, I. G. M., & Santian, I. M. A. (2020). Need Analysis for Developing Applied Mathematics Textbooks Based on Blended Learning to Improve Problem Solving Abilities at the Students of Polytechnic State of Bali. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2268. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0018166
Fauziah, D., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2018). Mathematics authentic assessment on statistics learning: The case for student mini projects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 012123. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012123
Ferita, R. A. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat penilaian autentik untuk pembelajaran matematika di kelas VIII semester 1. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v3i1.126
Fitriani, S., & Yarmayani, A. (2018). Pengembangan rubrik berpikir kreatif siswa menengah atas dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Mushorafa, 7(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v7i1.339
Fu, Y., Liu, Q., & Li, Y. (2021). New Geometric Constants in Banach Spaces Related to the Inscribed Equilateral Triangles of Unit Balls. Symmetry, 13(6), 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13060951
Garnica, A. V. M, & Vianna, C. R. (2019). Oral History and Mathematics Education (Antonio Vicente Marafioti Garnica (ed.); Issue September 2019). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16311-2
Ghani, I. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Yahaya, N. A., & Surif, J. (2017). Enhancing students’ HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00120G
Hasbi, M., Lukito, A., Sulaiman, R., & Muzaini, M. (2019). Improving the Mathematical Connection Ability of Middle-School Students through Realistic Mathematics Approach. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy, 1(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v1n1.p37-46
Hassan, M. N., Abdullah, A. H., Ismail, N., Suhud, S. N. A., & Hamzah, M. H. (2018). Mathematics Curriculum Framework for Early Childhood Education Based on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3960
Horvath, I. (2016). Disruptive technologies in higher education. 2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), CogInfoCom, 000347–000352. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2016.7804574
Ilany, B.-S., & Shmueli, N. (2021). “Three-Stage” Alternative Assessment. Creative Education, 12(07), 1702–1725. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.127130
Ilmiwan, B., Festiyed, & Usmeldi. (2019). Development of authentic assessment that based on scientific approach to improve students’ skills of science process in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012033
Kallia, M., van Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2021). Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: a literature-informed Delphi study. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104
Kingston, N., & Broaddus, A. (2017). The Use of Learning Map Systems to Support the Formative Assessment in Mathematics. Education Sciences, 7(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010041
Li, N., Huijser, H., Xi, Y., Limniou, M., Zhang, X., & Kek, M. Y. C. A. (2022). Disrupting the Disruption: A Digital Learning HeXie Ecology Model. Education Sciences, 12(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020063
Lupyan, G. (2017). The Paradox of the Universal Triangle: Concepts, Language, and Prototypes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1130730
Markovits, Z., & Patkin, D. (2020). Preschool In-service Teachers and Geometry: Attitudes, Beliefs and Knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), em0619. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9303
Morino, L. (2021). Basic Euclidean Geometry. In Mathematics and Mechanics - The Interplay: Vol. III (pp. 175–202). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63207-9_5
Novita, R., Putra, M., Rosayanti, E., & Fitriati, F. (2018). Design learning in mathematics education: Engaging early childhood students in geometrical activities to enhance geometry and spatial reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088, 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012016
Pereira, J., Wijaya, T. T., Zhou, Y., & Purnama, A. (2021). Learning points, lines, and plane geometry with Hawgent dynamic mathematics software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012057
Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis. (2018). Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning: Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Pre-service Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012013
Putri, R. O. E., & Feriyanto, F. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar geometri berbasis science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) untuk mendukung kemampuan spasial. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 1205. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3141
Sabri, M., Retnawati, H., & Fitriatunisyah. (2019). The implementation of authentic assessment in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1200(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1200/1/012006
Schoevers, E. M., Leseman, P. P. M., Slot, E. M., Bakker, A., Keijzer, R., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2019). Promoting pupils’ creative thinking in primary school mathematics: A case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31(October 2018), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.02.003
Shahbari, J. A., & Abu-Alhija, F. N. (2018). Does Training in Alternative Assessment Matter? The Case of Prospective and Practicing Mathematics Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Alternative Assessment and Their Beliefs About the Nature of Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(7), 1315–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9830-6
Stewart, Ian (2017). Why Do All Triangles Form a Triangle? The American Mathematical Monthly, 124(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.124.1.70
Suskie, L. (2018). What is Good Assessment? In Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.utep.edu/student-affairs/_Files/docs/Assessment/What-is-Good-Assessment-Suskie-3.pdf
Syaifuddin, M. (2020). Implementation of authentic assessment on mathematics teaching: Study on junior high school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1491–1502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1491
Taruh, E., & Mursalin. (2018). Development of Authentic Assesment Tools in Physics Science Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 012200. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012200
Ulusoy, F. (2021). Prospective Early Childhood and Elementary School Mathematics Teachers’ Concept Images and Concept Definitions of Triangles. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 1057–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10105-6
Vidergor, H. E. (2018). Effectiveness of the multidimensional curriculum model in developing higher‐order thinking skills in elementary and secondary students. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1318771
Waller, P. P, & Flood, C. T. (2016). Mathematics as a universal language: transcending cultural lines. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-01-2016-0004
Wang, X., Chen, Y., & Zhu, W. (2021). A Survey on Curriculum Learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3069908
Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in science education curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012044
Widyastuti, S. R., Tola, B., & Tjalla, A. (2021). Modeling authentic assessment : Using analysis based on the Structural Equation Model ( SEM ) Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education Research Article. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6), 5058–5074.
Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., & Suan, L. (2020). Using Geogebra in Teaching Plane Vector. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v3i1.p15-23
Yazidah, N. I. (2017). Analisis kesalahan menyelesaikan soal pembuktian geometri Euclid ditinjau dari gender pada mahasiswa IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol2no1.2017pp71-80
Zeggelaar, A., Vermeulen, M., & Jochems, W. (2020). Evaluating effective professional development. Professional Development in Education, 00(00), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1744686
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Abd Kadir Jaelani, Muhammad Hasbi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
