Students’ Perceptions of Hybrid Learning in The Face-To-Face Meeting System (PTM) Limited to Science Lesson at The MTs Level

Silvia Melinda Paramitha; Lisdityanti Nurul H.; Farda Zahroh Dinafil A; Putri Tasyana W.F.; Tatik Indayati; Mudji Lastutik; Sri Utami; Lailul Maromi

doi:10.15642/ijsl.v2i2.1426

Authors

Silvia Melinda Paramitha UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Lisdityanti Nurul H. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Farda Zahroh Dinafil A UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Putri Tasyana W.F. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Tatik Indayati UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Mudji Lastutik UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Sri Utami UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Lailul Maromi UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/ijsl.v2i2.1426

Keywords:

Hybrid Learning, Limited PTM, Science Learning

Abstract

This study aims to determine students' perceptions of learning Hybrid Learning in the Limited PTM System in Science Subjects Class IX at the SMP/MTs level. The research method uses descriptive qualitative methods. The data in the study were in the form of a questionnaire with 14 questions to students. The data analysis technique in this qualitative research is using data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. One of the advantages of implementing Hybrid learning is being able to improve students' cognitive learning outcomes. However, in limited PTM the problem faced by students is limited student social interaction, students have difficulty understanding the material. So, among the weaknesses in limited PTM it is assumed that Hybrid Learning is able to overcome problems that occur when PTM is limited. So, it is important to do this research. The results of this study namely students' perceptions of Hybrid Learning learning that Hybrid Learning makes it easier for students to understand the material, students feel happy when learning Hybrid Learning because they can communicate directly both with teachers and with friends. So, it can be concluded that students' perceptions of Hybrid Learning give a positive response.

References

Astuti, S. I., Arso, S. P. and Wigati, P. A. (2015) ‘済無No Title No Title No Title’, Analisis Standar Pelayanan Minimal Pada Instalasi Rawat Jalan di RSUD Kota Semarang, 3, pp. 103–111.

Belakang, L. and Muka, P. T. (2021) ‘Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia ( Japendi ) Pendidikan PENERAPAN MODEL DIGITAL DAN MODEL HYBRID DALAM PEMBELAJARAN JARAK JAUH ( PJJ ) SELAMA PANDEMI COVID - 19’, 2(10), pp. 1800–1811.

Herlina, H. and Suherman, M. (2020) ‘Potensi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga Dan Kesehatan (Pjok) Di Tengah Pandemi Corona Virus Disease (Covid)-19 Di Sekolah Dasar’, Tadulako Journal Sport Sciences And Physical Education, 8(1), pp. 1–7. Available at: http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/PJKR/article/view/16186.

Hidayatullah, F. and Anwar, K. (2020) ‘Hybrid Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Sekolah Dasar Dan Menengah Maupun Pendidikan Olahraga Perguruan Tinggi’, Prosiding SENOPATI (Seminar Olahraga Pendidikan dalam Teknologi dan Inovasi), 1(1), pp. 1–7. Available at: http://publikasi.stkippgri-bkl.ac.id/index.php/senopati/article/view/502/359.

Imania, K. A. (2019) ‘Hybrid Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru Di Era Industri 4.0’, Jurnal Petik, 5(2), pp. 30–35. doi: 10.31980/jpetik.v5i2.569.

Journal, D. et al. (2021) ‘PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN HYBRID LEARNING DENGAN METODE TUTOR SEBAYA TERHADAP HASIL’, 7(2), pp. 532–543.

Kholik, N. et al. (2021) POTRET PENDIDIKAN DAN GURU DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. EDU PUBLISHER. Available at: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=JDsfEAAAQBAJ.

Makhin, M. (2022) ‘HYBRID LEARNING : MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PADA MASA’, 5(2).

Mata, P., Praktikum, K. and Padang, U. N. (2021) ‘Penerapan Model Hybrid Learning’, pp. 292–297.

Ode, L. et al. (2021) ‘Analisis Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas (TMT) di Masa New Normal terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika di Sekolah Dasar’, Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), pp. 4400–4406. Available at: https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/index.

Oktavianto, D. A. (2021) ‘Field Study Terintegrasi Hybrid Learning : Solusi Pembelajaran’, 5(1), pp. 1–14.

Prastyawan (2011) ‘Inovasi kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Menggunakan Hybrid Learning pada Pendidikan Kesetaraan’, Al-Hikmah, 1(September), pp. 170–181.

Puspitorini, D. A. et al. (2020) ‘Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Melalui Pembelajaran Tpsw Berbasis Hybrid-Learning Materi Sistem Sirkulasi’, Bioma : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 9(1), pp. 41–53. doi: 10.26877/bioma.v9i1.6033.

Putra, I. A. (2015) ‘Orientasi Hybrid Learning Melalui Model Hybrid Learning Dengan’, Eduscope, 1(1), pp. 36–42.

Setyawan, F. H. (2021) ‘Small Group Learning : Solusi Belajar pada Masa Pandemi’, Jurnal Pendidikan Modern, 07(01), pp. 20–25.

Siregar, I. Y., Susilo, H. and Suwono, H. (2017) ‘The Effect of Think-Pair-Share-Write Based on Hybrid Learning on Metakognitive Skills, Creative Thinking and Cognitive Learning at SMA Negeri 3 Malang’, Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3(2), p. 183. doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v3i2.4217.

Sistiarini, R. D., Ishaq, M. and Sulthoni (2021) ‘Kajian Konseptual PTM Terbatas dengan PJJ di Lembaga PAUD’, Seminar Nasional Peta Jalan Pendidikan dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, 1(1), pp. 73–84.

Sunarno, W. (2018) ‘Makalah Utama Peran Pendidik dan Ilmuwan Sains dalam Menyongsong Revolusi ISSN : 2527-6670 Pembelajaran IPA di Era Revolusi Industri 4 . 0’, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika IV, pp. 1–8.