Socrative Sebagai Student Response System dalam Pembelajaran Daring Bahasa Arab

Authors

  • Majidatun Ahmala STAI Taruna Surabaya
  • Saudati Alfira Rahmatillah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Tadarrosatul Hikmiyah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Keywords:

Kata kunci: media pembelajaran, pembelajaran daring bahasa Arab, socrative, student response system.

Abstract

Purpose-Analyzing the socratives effectiveness as a media-based assessment of student response systems in the Arabic lessons during online classes.

 Design/Methodology/Approach-This research is using descriptive-qualitative methods and was done in MAN Sidoarjo. This research methods used a simple random sampling by students of the 11 th grades IPA 1 and 2 with total population is 25 students. The data assemblings has collected by observation, interviews, and documentation. Furthermore, the data will be processed by source triangulation.

 

Findings: Socrative is an effective medium to provide teaching servis on Arabic lessons. There are three types of questions in the socrative methods and it was multiple choice, true/false, and short answer, and it might be able to cover the eight question type that have been developed by the Arabic language teacher of MAN Sidoarjo. This statement is giving a prove to us that socative methods colud be very helpful to facilitate teachers in developing strategies for creating exam questions, and from 25 sampling, 19 students are expressed their interest in using socrative in Arabic online learning class for various reasons.

 Research Limitation/Implications: This reseach can’t reached more deeper than the reseach on space race and exit ticket because the socrative menu that being used in the field is focused on quick question, however, even though this reseach was focused on quick question, researcher found that socrative used maximally by the teacher. They use it to create various types of question in purpose to get feedback from students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmala, Majidatun. “Ta’lim Al-Mufradhat Bi Uslub Al-Muhadtsah Al-Taswiriyah Bi Madrasah ‘Nurul Islam’ Al-Ibtidaiyah Al-Islamiyah Sidoarjo.” Alfazuna 01 Nomor 0, no. 2 (2017): 163–175. http://jurnalftk.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/alfazuna/article/view/15.
Al-Khuli, Muhammad ’Ali. Asalib Tadris Al-Lughah Al-’Arabiyah. Riyadh: Al-Mamlakah Al-’Araiyah Al-Su’udiyah, 1984.
Ambiyar. Pengukuran & Tes Dalam Pendidikan. Padang: UNP Press, 2011. http://repository.unp.ac.id/16069/1/BUKU PENGEMBANGAN TES OK.pdf.
Gusty, Sri dkk. Belajar Mandiri: Pembelajaran Daring Di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.
Harumurti, Herman Yosep Endrayanto dan Yustiana Wahyu. Penilaian Belajar Siswa Di Sekolah. Edited by Yosef Bayu Anangga Erni Setiyowati. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2014.
HM, Muhammad Anwar. “Inovasi Sistem Pendidikan.” Inspiratif Pendidikan 7, no. 2 (2018): 161.
Jahja, Yudrik. Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta Timur: Kencana, 2015.
King, Laura A. Psikologi Umum: Sebuah Pandangan Apresiatif. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2014.
Mahirah. “Evaluasi Belajar Peserta Didik (Siswa).” Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan 1, no. 2 (2017): 257–267.
Miladya, Junda. “Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab.” Konferensi Nasional bahasa Arab I 20, no. 01 (2018): 19.
Mubarok, Husni. Ketika Guru Dan Siswa Saling Bercermin: Kajian Refleksi Diri, Membangun Motivasi Menuju Perbaikan Diri. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2017.
Muhammad, Muhammad ’Abdul Khaliq. Ikhtibarat Al-Lughah. Al-Riyadh: Imad Shuun Al-Maktabat-Jami’ah Al-Malik Su’ud, 1989.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. Penilaian Otentik Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2018.
Nuruddin, Mamduh. Mudzakkirah Fi Tadris Mufradhat. Al-Mamlakah Al-’Arabiyah Al-Su’udiyah Jami’ah Al-Imam Muhammad bin Su’ud Al-Islamiyah Ma’had Al-’Ulum Al-Islamiyah wal Arabiyah bi Indonesia, 1988.
Prathiwi, Adjeng, and Lisa Utami. “Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa Menengah Atas Menggunakan Model Inquiry Pictorial Riddle.” Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry 11, no. 2 (2019): 64–72.
Team, Socrative. “Meet Socrative.” Accessed April 21, 2021. https://www.socrative.com/.
Tomaswick, Leighann. “Assessments – Student Response Systems” (2017): 2–5.
Triowathi, Noni, and Astuti Wijayanti. “Implementasi Team Games Tournament (Tgt) Dalam Meningkatkan Kerjasama Dan Hasil Belajar Ipa.” Jurnal Pijar Mipa 13, no. 2 (2018): 110.
Umiyatun. “Penggunaan Media Gambar Berseri Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Cerpen Di SMA Negeri 1 Parittiga.” In Prosiding Sembadra Universitas Sriwijaya, 29–35. Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya, 2019. file:///C:/Users/ok/Downloads/1587-3352-1-PB.pdf.
University, Teaching & Learning Technologies of Northwestern. “Student Response System (SRS).” Last modified 2020. Accessed April 21, 2021. https://www.it.northwestern.edu/srs/.
Wahyuni, Sri, Jan Mujiyanto, Dwi Rukmini, and Sri Wuli. “Persepsi Guru Terhadap Penggunaan Socrative Sebagai Media Penilaian Interaktif.” Jurnal Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana 1, no. March (2020): 309–314.
Warwick, Lindsay. “Socrative: Flexible, Free, Easy-to-Use Assessment Tool.” Last modified 2017. Accessed April 21, 2021. https://thedigitalteacher.com/reviews/socrative.
Winaryati, Eny. “Penilaian Kompetensi Siswa Abad 21.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Internasional 6, no. 1 (2018): 6–19.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Ahmala, M., Alfira Rahmatillah, S. ., & Hikmiyah, T. . (2021). Socrative Sebagai Student Response System dalam Pembelajaran Daring Bahasa Arab. Jurnal Alfazuna : Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 6(1), 85–111. Retrieved from http://jurnalftk.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/alfazuna/article/view/1156

Issue

Section

Articles