The Improvement of Science Learning Outcomes and Intrapersonal Intelligence Through Course Review Horay of Third Grade Students at MI Mazra’atul Ulum 01 Lamongan

Authors

  • Ikrima Ikrima MI Mazra’atul Ulum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/ijsl.v2i1.1242

Keywords:

Learning outcomes, Intrapersonal intelligence, Course Review Horay strategy

Abstract

This research was conducted because the learning process is lack student’s enthusiasm and passion, it tends to be not interested learning. The previous student learning outcomes were only 13% who reach the minimum completeness criteria. Learning so far has used the lecture method so it is necessary to apply a course review horay strategy. This research was conducted at MI Mazra'atul Ulum 01 Lamongan. The method used in this research is classroom action research which consists of 2 cycles, each cycle through 4 stages, namely planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. Data were obtained through interviews, questionnaires, worksheets and documentation. Data on student learning outcomes were analyzed by SPSS to determine the increase in students learning outcomes and intrapersonal intelligence in each cycle. The results showed that: (1) The implementation of the course review horay strategy has done well because it is able to increase the activities of teachers and students. In the pre-cycle teacher, activity has a percentage of 58% (less), cycle 1 has a percentage of 71% (good), and cycle 2 has a percentage of 73% (good). In the pre-cycle student’s activity has a percentage of 42% (less), cycle 1 has a percentage of 58% (less), and cycle 2 has a percentage of 83% (good). (2) Data on student learning outcomes in the pre-cycle has a percentage of 13% with an average of 48.8 (less), in cycle 1 got a percentage of 94% with an average of 78.2 (good) and in cycle 2 got a percentage of 94% with an average 78.6 (good). (3) Intrapersonal intelligence in pre-cycle has a percentage of 40%, cycle 1 has a percentage of 88%, and cycle 2 has a percentage of 96%.

References

Ahmadi, A., dkk. (1991). Bimbingan dan Konsultasi di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Amri, S. (2013). Pengembangan dan Model Pembelajaran dalam Kurikulum 2013, Jakarta: PT. Prestasi Pustakarya.

Armstrong. (2002). Identifying And Developing Your Multiple Intelligences (Menemukan dan Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Anda Berdasarkan Teori Multiple Intelligences, Terj. T. Hermaya) Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Alder. (2001). Boost Your Intelligence: Pacu EQ dan IQ Anda. Terj. Christina Prianingsih. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Baihaqi, M. (2008). Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Surabaya: LAPIS PGMI.

Burnie, D. Jendela IPTEK: Kehidupan diterjemahkan oleh Astrid Ratna, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Efi M, N. (2016). Keefektifan Strategi Course Review Horay terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa IPS (Jurnal elektronik)

Hamim, N. (2009). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Surabaya: PT.Revka Petra Media.

Huda, M. (2014). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

, (2015). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. International Inc, Groiler, 2004, Ilmu Pengetahuan Populer, Jakarta: PT. Widyadara.

Jaeng, M. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Palu: FKIP Universitas Tadukalo.

Jarvis, M. (2007). Teori-Teori Psikologi: Pendekatan Modern Untuk Memahami Perilaku Perasaan dan Pikiran Manusia, Bandung: Nusamedia Dan Nuansa.

Jihad, A. dkk. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Kurnianto, R., dkk. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Surabaya: Lapis PGMI.

Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Maryam, S., dkk. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horay untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Vol 04 No. 01.

Mulyasa. (2007). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Narbuko, C., dkk. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nurkancana, W. (1986). Evaluasi Pendidikan, Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Oxlade, C. (2007). Buku Pintar, Yogyakarta: Platinum.

Pramadita. (2015). Keefektifan Course Review Horay terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Vol 2 No. 2

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative Learning, Bandung: Nusa Media.

Sugiyono. (2007) Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suparman S. (2010). Gaya Mengajar yang Menyenangkan Siswa, Yogyakarta: Pinus Book Publisher.

Suprijono, A. (2014). Cooperative Learning, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Suharsimi A, 2007, dkk, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suryani, N. (2012). Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Susanti, dkk, (2001). Mencetak Anak Juara:Belajar Dari Pengalaman 50 Anak Juara, Yogyakarta: Kata Hati.

Suyadi, (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Karakter, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wakhidah, N. (2016). Strategi Scaffolding Inspiring-Modeling-Writing-Reporting (IMWR) dalam Menerapkan Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep, Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Wardiana, U. (2004). Psikologi Umum, Jakarta: PT. Bina Ilmu.

Wena, M. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Ikrima, I. (2021). The Improvement of Science Learning Outcomes and Intrapersonal Intelligence Through Course Review Horay of Third Grade Students at MI Mazra’atul Ulum 01 Lamongan. Indonesian Journal of Science Learning (IJSL), 2(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijsl.v2i1.1242

Issue

Section

Articles